HomeCoinsBitcoinPapers related to Bitcoin and associated subjects in regulation: Half XXIII

Papers related to Bitcoin and associated subjects in regulation: Half XXIII

This text was first printed on Dr. Craig Wright’s weblog, and we republished with permission from the creator. Learn Half 1, Half 2, Half 3, Half 4, Half 5, Half 6, Half 7, Half 8, Half 9, Half 10, Half 11, Half 12, Half 13, Half 14, Half 15, Half 16, Half 17, Half 18, Half 19, Half 20, Half 21, and Half 22.

The articles introduced on this annotated bibliography exhibit a complete argument concerning the affect of deception and misinformation in varied domains, together with enterprise technique, advertising and marketing, and digital environments. For instance, Chelliah and Swamy (2018) spotlight deception and lies in enterprise technique, emphasizing the short-term benefits they could provide but additionally the detrimental long-term penalties, similar to injury to repute and lack of belief. Conte de Leon et al. (2017) discover the properties and misconceptions of blockchain know-how, discussing its potential utility in combating digital deception. They counsel that the blockchain’s transparency and immutability can improve the credibility and verifiability of data.

Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) concentrate on inappropriate content material in advertising and marketing, notably pretend information, discussing the moral implications and the significance of selling truthful info to construct belief with shoppers. Additional, Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020) suggest leveraging distributed ledger applied sciences, particularly blockchain know-how, to fight pretend information, disinformation, and deepfakes. They argue that the blockchain’s properties, similar to decentralization and transparency, can improve the trustworthiness of digital info. Subsequent, Kamps and Kleinberg (2018) deal with the difficulty of pump-and-dump schemes within the cryptocurrency market, highlighting the fraudulent nature of such practices and the necessity for detection strategies to guard buyers and keep market integrity.

This results in Music et al. (2019), who investigates the affect of misleading advertising and marketing throughout pseudo-product-harm crises on shopper sentiment. They discover that misleading advertising and marketing practices result in a decline in belief and model evaluations, highlighting the significance of transparency and moral advertising and marketing practices. The articles look at varied dimensions of deception, misinformation, and fraudulent practices. They supply insights into the implications of such practices in several domains, suggest potential options or applied sciences (e.g., blockchain know-how) to fight them, and spotlight the moral issues concerned. Whereas every article has a novel focus and scope, they contribute to a broader understanding of the challenges and potential cures associated to deception and misinformation in several contexts.

The articles beneath dialogue embody a big scope, and concentrate on deception and its implications in varied domains. Chelliah and Swamy (2018) delve into enterprise technique, particularly analyzing deception and lies inside this context. Conte de Leon et al. (2017) concentrate on the properties and misconceptions surrounding blockchain know-how, aiming to make clear this rising subject. Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) slender their focus to advertising and marketing, delving into inappropriate content material and particularly addressing the difficulty of faux information. Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020) discover using distributed ledger applied sciences, similar to blockchain know-how, to fight digital deception in a broader sense. Kamps and Kleinberg (2018) zoom in on the cryptocurrency market, investigating the phenomenon of pump-and-dump schemes. Lastly, Music et al. (2019) direct their analysis in direction of the affect of misleading advertising and marketing throughout pseudo-product-harm crises on shopper sentiment. General, every article contributes distinctive insights into understanding deception in its respective area.

The articles into consideration look at deception and associated points throughout varied domains. First, Chelliah and Swamy (2018) delve into the intricacies of deception inside enterprise technique, emphasizing its implications on this context. Subsequent, Conte de Leon et al. (2017) and Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020) discover the implications of deception in digital environments, with the previous specializing in the misconceptions surrounding blockchain know-how and the latter discussing using distributed ledger applied sciences to fight digital deception. Subsequent, Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) slender their focus to the advertising and marketing area, particularly analyzing problematic content material, together with the dissemination of faux information. Subsequent, Kamps and Kleinberg (2018) delve into the cryptocurrency market, learning the phenomenon of pump-and-dump schemes, whereas Music et al. (2019) examine the affect of misleading advertising and marketing on shopper sentiment. Every article affords useful insights into deception inside its area, contributing to a complete understanding of the topic.

Lastly, ethics and the moral implications of deception are key issues addressed in a number of articles. Chelliah and Swamy (2018) and Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) explicitly talk about the moral dimensions of deception, underscoring the significance of transparency and moral decision-making in enterprise technique and advertising and marketing, respectively. They advocate for moral practices to construct belief and keep long-term relationships with stakeholders. Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020) additionally spotlight the moral facets of their exploration of combating pretend information and disinformation, emphasizing the necessity to defend people from the detrimental penalties of misleading practices. Kamps and Kleinberg (2018) and Music et al. (2019) focus extra on the affect of misleading practices and fraudulent schemes on stakeholders, highlighting the moral issues arising from such practices. Collectively, the articles emphasize the importance of moral issues in addressing deception, advocating for transparency, trust-building, and accountable decision-making in varied domains.

The articles collectively argue for the significance of honesty, transparency, and moral decision-making throughout varied domains. They underscore the detrimental penalties of deception, misinformation, and fraudulent practices, whereas additionally suggesting potential options, together with blockchain know-how, to fight digital deception and restore belief in info dissemination. Whereas the articles mentioned deal with totally different facets of deception, misinformation, and fraudulent practices, they’ve some notable variations and similarities.

Annotated Bibliography

Chelliah, J., & Swamy, Y. (2018). Deception and lies in enterprise technique. Journal of Enterprise Technique39(6), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2017-0135

The article by Chelliah and Swamy (2018) titled “Deception and lies in business strategy” explores the function of deception and lies within the context of enterprise technique. The authors delve into the assorted methods by which deception is employed by organizations and its potential affect on their strategic decision-making processes. The authors spotlight that deception in enterprise technique can take totally different types, similar to deceptive monetary reporting, false guarantees to stakeholders, or concealing essential info from opponents.

They emphasize that whereas deception might provide short-term benefits, it will probably have detrimental long-term penalties for organizations, together with injury to repute, authorized penalties, and lack of stakeholder belief. Chelliah and Swamy (2018) additionally talk about the moral implications of deception in enterprise technique, arguing that it goes in opposition to rules of transparency and honesty. As a substitute, they emphasize the significance of moral decision-making and counsel that organizations undertake methods primarily based on integrity and belief. Sadly, firms similar to “Google and Facebook have long argued that they are providers of neutral platforms for the exchange of ideas as distinct from being publishers (Chelliah & Swamy, 2018, p. 35) while actively interacting with the content of advertising material.

In conclusion, the article by Chelliah and Swamy (2018) sheds light on the role of deception and lies in business strategy. It highlights the potential risks and ethical concerns associated with such practices and encourages organizations to prioritize transparency and honesty in their strategic decision-making processes.

Conte de Leon, D., Stalick, A. Q., Jillepalli, A. A., Haney, M. A., & Sheldon, F. T. (2017). Blockchain: Properties and misconceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship11(3), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-12-2017-034
The article by Conte de Leon et al.(2017) titled “Blockchain: Properties and misconceptions” explores the properties and customary misconceptions surrounding blockchain know-how. The authors purpose to make clear the basic traits of blockchain and dispel any misunderstandings related to it.

Conte de Leon et al.(2017) start by explaining the important thing properties of blockchain, similar to decentralization, immutability, transparency, and safety. They emphasize that blockchain is a distributed ledger know-how that permits safe and clear transactions with out intermediaries. In addition they talk about the idea of consensus algorithms and their function in sustaining the integrity of the blockchain community.

Moreover, the article addresses a number of misconceptions about blockchain know-how. The authors deal with the misperception that blockchain and cryptocurrency are synonymous, highlighting that whereas blockchain is the underlying know-how behind cryptocurrencies, its purposes prolong far past digital currencies. In addition they deal with misconceptions about blockchain scalability, power consumption, and privateness issues.

General, the article gives an summary of the properties of blockchain know-how and addresses widespread misconceptions surrounding its implementation. Sadly, the authors mistakingly misrepresent a Blockchain system as “[a]n emergent ledger or blockchain, in a DLS, is the resulting ledger for which the majority of the users on the network agree at any given time” (Conte de Leon et al., 2017, pp. 291–292). The paper serves as a useful resource for people looking for to know the basic facets of blockchain and its potential purposes past ‘cryptocurrencies’, but it surely must be analyzed primarily based on the character of the system and never widespread misperceptions.

Di Domenico, G., & Visentin, M. (2020). Pretend information or true lies? Reflections about problematic contents in advertising and marketing. Worldwide Journal of Market Analysis62(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320934719

The article by Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) titled “Fake news or true lies? Reflections about problematic contents in marketing” explores the difficulty of inappropriate content material, particularly pretend information, in advertising and marketing. The authors delve into the implications and challenges posed by the unfold of faux information and talk about the duty of entrepreneurs in addressing this subject. Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) spotlight the rise of faux information within the digital age and its potential affect on shopper habits and decision-making. They argue that spreading misinformation can hurt society and belief in advertising and marketing communications. In addition they talk about the function of social media platforms in disseminating pretend information and the challenges they face in tackling this drawback.

Di Domenico and Visentin (2020) emphasize the moral issues for entrepreneurs when coping with inappropriate content material. They stress the significance of selling truthful, correct info to construct shopper belief. In addition they counsel that entrepreneurs ought to proactively deal with and counter pretend information via transparency, fact-checking, and accountable content material creation. Whereas Di Domenico and Visentin (2020, p. 410) talk about utterly pretend information, the authors additionally look at partially right info the place “there is disinformation rooted in a truthful reality but distorted to the point that the core facts are no longer factual”.

In conclusion, the article highlights the importance of addressing problematic content material, notably pretend information, in advertising and marketing. It emphasizes the moral obligations of entrepreneurs in selling truthful info and gives insights on methods to fight the unfold of faux information within the digital panorama.

Fraga-Lamas, P., & Fernandez-Carames, T. M. (2020). Pretend Information, Disinformation, and Deepfakes: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Applied sciences and Blockchain to Fight Digital Deception and Counterfeit Actuality. IT Skilled22(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2020.2977589

The article by Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020) titled “Fake News, Disinformation, and Deepfakes: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain to Combat Digital Deception and Counterfeit Reality” explores using distributed ledger applied sciences, particularly blockchain, in addressing the challenges posed by pretend information, disinformation, and deepfakes. Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020, p. 54) observe, “[t]he term “deepfakes” referred initially to manipulated movies with face-swapping strategies”. The paper partially captures a way of figuring out this info however misses how a number of sources could be created concurrently when many Blockchain techniques exist.

Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames (2020) spotlight the rising issues surrounding the spreading of false info and manipulated media within the digital realm. They talk about the potential penalties of those misleading practices on society, together with the erosion of belief, manipulation of public opinion, and threats to democracy.

Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames suggest that distributed ledger applied sciences, similar to blockchain, could be leveraged as a possible resolution to fight digital deception. They clarify how the properties of blockchain, together with decentralization, immutability, and transparency, can improve the credibility and verifiability of data. They counsel that blockchain can be utilized to create decentralized fact-checking techniques, present transparency in creating and disseminating content material, and allow customers to confirm the authenticity of data and media. The article additionally addresses the challenges and limitations of implementing blockchain-based options, similar to scalability, privateness issues, and the necessity for collaboration amongst stakeholders.

In conclusion, the authors advocate for adopting distributed ledger applied sciences, notably blockchain, to fight pretend information, disinformation, and deepfakes. They spotlight the potential advantages of blockchain in enhancing the trustworthiness and reliability of digital info and emphasize the necessity for additional analysis and collaboration to completely notice its potential in addressing the challenges of digital deception.

Kamps, J., & Kleinberg, B. (2018). To the moon: Defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps. Crime Science7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0093-5

The article by Kamps and Kleinberg (2018) titled “To the moon: Defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps” focuses on the phenomenon of pump-and-dump schemes within the context of cryptocurrencies. The authors purpose to outline and detect these schemes to make clear the manipulative practices prevalent within the cryptocurrency market. As Kamps and Kleinberg (2018, p. 2) talk about, “[a] pump-and-dump scheme is a type of fraud in which the offenders accumulate a commodity over a period, then artificially inflate the price through means of spreading misinformation (pumping), before selling off what they bought to unsuspecting buyers at the higher price (dumping).”

The authors start by explaining the idea of pump-and-dump schemes, the place a gaggle of people artificially inflates the worth of a cryptocurrency via coordinated shopping for, making a hype or “pump,” after which sells their holdings on the inflated worth, inflicting a subsequent worth crash or “dump”. Subsequent, they spotlight the fraudulent nature of those schemes and the detrimental affect they’ve on buyers and the general market.
Kamps and Kleinberg (2020) suggest a technique for detecting pump-and-dump schemes by analyzing buying and selling information and figuring out irregular buying and selling patterns related to such schemes. They define a framework that mixes statistical evaluation and machine studying strategies to detect suspicious buying and selling actions. The article additionally discusses the challenges in detecting and prosecuting pump-and-dump schemes as a result of decentralized and nameless nature of the cryptocurrency market. Lastly, the authors emphasize the significance of regulatory measures and elevated consciousness to mitigate the dangers related to these manipulative practices.

In conclusion, the article gives insights into the phenomenon of pump-and-dump schemes within the cryptocurrency market. Moreover, Kamps and Kleinberg (2018) suggest a detection framework and spotlight the necessity for regulatory actions to fight these fraudulent actions and defend buyers within the evolving panorama of cryptocurrencies.

Music, R., Kim, H., Lee, G. M., & Jang, S. (2019). Does Misleading Advertising and marketing Pay? The Evolution of Client Sentiment Surrounding a Pseudo-Product-Hurt Disaster. Journal of Enterprise Ethics158(3), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3720-2

The article by Music et al. (2019) titled “Does Deceptive Marketing Pay? The Evolution of Consumer Sentiment Surrounding a Pseudo-Product-Harm Crisis” investigates the affect of misleading advertising and marketing on shopper sentiment throughout a pseudo-product-harm disaster. The authors purpose to know how misleading advertising and marketing practices affect shopper perceptions and attitudes in direction of a model. The research focuses on a hypothetical state of affairs the place a model engages in misleading advertising and marketing, making a notion of product hurt that doesn’t exist. The authors analyze how shoppers’ sentiments evolve when confronted with such misleading practices.

The findings of the research counsel that misleading advertising and marketing negatively impacts shopper sentiment, resulting in a decline in belief and model evaluations. Initially, shoppers react strongly to the perceived product hurt, expressing detrimental sentiments. Nonetheless, as extra info turns into accessible and the deception is revealed, shopper sentiment steadily shifts in direction of skepticism and dissatisfaction with the model.

The article additionally highlights the function of company social duty (CSR) as a mitigating issue. It means that manufacturers with a powerful CSR repute might be able to recuperate and regain shopper belief extra successfully in comparison with manufacturers with a weaker CSR repute. As “[o]nline chatter amplifies the negative effect of recalls on downstream sales nearly 4.5 times” (Music et al., 2019, p. 745), inaction can result in long-term repute prices.
In conclusion, the article demonstrates that misleading advertising and marketing practices hurt shopper sentiment. It emphasizes the significance of transparency and moral advertising and marketing practices in constructing and sustaining shopper belief. The research underscores the potential long-term detrimental penalties of misleading advertising and marketing, and highlights the importance of CSR in managing and recovering from pseudo-product-harm crises.

References

Chelliah, J., & Swamy, Y. (2018). Deception and lies in enterprise technique. Journal of Enterprise Technique39(6), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2017-0135

Conte de Leon, D., Stalick, A. Q., Jillepalli, A. A., Haney, M. A., & Sheldon, F. T. (2017). Blockchain: Properties and misconceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship11(3), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-12-2017-034

Di Domenico, G., & Visentin, M. (2020). Pretend information or true lies? Reflections about problematic contents in advertising and marketing. Worldwide Journal of Market Analysis62(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320934719

Fraga-Lamas, P., & Fernandez-Carames, T. M. (2020). Pretend Information, Disinformation, and Deepfakes: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Applied sciences and Blockchain to Fight Digital Deception and Counterfeit Actuality. IT Skilled22(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2020.2977589
Kamps, J., & Kleinberg, B. (2018). To the moon: Defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps. Crime Science7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0093-5

Music, R., Kim, H., Lee, G. M., & Jang, S. (2019). Does Misleading Advertising and marketing Pay? The Evolution of Client Sentiment Surrounding a Pseudo-Product-Hurt Disaster. Journal of Enterprise Ethics158(3), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3720-2

Watch The Bitcoin Masterclasses: Wallets and overlay companies on the Bitcoin community

YouTube video

width=”562″ peak=”315″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=”allowfullscreen”>

New to blockchain? Try CoinGeek’s Blockchain for Newbies part, the last word useful resource information to be taught extra about blockchain know-how.

Supply: https://coingeek.com/papers-associated-with-bitcoin-and-related-topics-in-law-part-xxiii/

LATEST POSTS

Payday Lenders Are Utilizing AI Algorithms: However Is This Good Or Unhealthy?

In a day and age the place our monetary transactions are more and more carried out digitally, the function of synthetic intelligence is certain to...

The Way forward for Bitcoin: Improvements, Challenges, and Alternatives

Bitcoin, the pioneering cryptocurrency, has regularly developed since its inception in 2009. As the primary decentralized digital foreign money, it has paved the best way...

ETH, SOL rise as crypto traders eye Solciety (SLCTY)

ETH and SOL costs jumped above $3,300 and $150 on Monday as cryptocurrencies rose.The upside follows an tried assassination of Donald Trump.As cryptocurrencies...

Zetly: Breakthrough in fan engagement and the economic system of sports activities, because of the NFT

This publish is a visitor contribution by Zetly All in One Sport Fan Engagement NFT Platform. Keep up to date with Zetly and get details about...

Most Popular

Please enter CoinGecko Free Api Key to get this plugin works.